 | Start a set with this search |
 | Include this search in one of my sets |
 | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
 | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
 | Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
10 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.htmlunit-user[Htmlunit-user] Re : Should HtmlUnit...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Guillemot | Jan 6, 2009 11:53 am | |
| Tom Anderson | Jan 6, 2009 12:34 pm | |
| Mike Bowler | Jan 6, 2009 1:25 pm | |
| Daniel Gredler | Jan 6, 2009 4:44 pm | |
| Ahmed Ashour | Jan 6, 2009 9:51 pm | |
| Marc Guillemot | Jan 8, 2009 6:16 am | |
| Francis Hitchens | Jan 8, 2009 8:14 am | |
| Hernan Soulages | Jan 8, 2009 12:55 pm | |
| George Dinwiddie | Jan 9, 2009 7:57 am | |
| Julien HENRY | Jan 10, 2009 3:25 am |
| Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [Htmlunit-user] Re : Should HtmlUnit move to Apache Foundation? | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Julien HENRY (henr...@yahoo.fr) | |
| Date: | Jan 10, 2009 3:25:07 am | |
| List: | net.sourceforge.lists.htmlunit-user | |
Hi guys,
For me, one advantage I see is the oportunity to have your bug tracker hoster on
JIRA (https://issues.apache.org) which is much a better tool than the
Sourceforge one. Another is that an Apache project is always considered as
serious in the mind of our managers, so it is easier to propose its use.
Regards,
Julien
----- Message d'origine ---- De : Marc Guillemot <mgui...@yahoo.fr> À : html...@lists.sourceforge.net Envoyé le : Jeudi, 8 Janvier 2009, 15h16mn 54s Objet : Re: [Htmlunit-user] Should HtmlUnit move to Apache Foundation?
Hi,
I'm a bit surprised by the lack of answers. I see two possible explanations: - we have only one user (hi Tom) ;-( - or our users don't care at all about this issue
@Tom: as Ahmed said, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't be able to preserve our reaction time therefore I don't think that it would have any consequence on snapshots. It may look a bit differently on releases, but this is only a thought, not based on facts.. Concerning Rhino, the situation has improved and we haven't currently any patch in our "fork". Nevertheless this fork allows us to decide when we want to release it and we don't need to wait for a new Rhino version. As said by Daniel, we could imagine to keep this fork as SF project.
Cheers, Marc.
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Marc Guillemot wrote:
- we wouldn't be as free as we are currently and would have to respect the Foundation's rules
Could you elaborate on this? Perhaps after talking to some guys from the Foundation.. One of the great things about HtmlUnit is that you guys react very quickly to bug reports, new ideas and so on. I'd hate to see you lose that - and i think you'd find it frustrating.
- particularly, I don't know if/how we could keep our Rhino fork (that is currently only a snapshot but that allows to control the release dates)
Do you think the Rhino project's speed at incorporating bugfixes is likely to improve in the near future?
tom
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________ Htmlunit-user mailing list Html...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB
_______________________________________________ Htmlunit-user mailing list Html...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user